CESTAT Chennai
2 articles
CENVAT Credit on Capital Goods Supplied Under a Works Contract Is Not Barred by the Contractor's Valuation Under Rule 2A: CESTAT Chennai in Toshiba JSW Power Systems
A Chennai Bench of the Tribunal accepted that the supply and erection orders were one works contract, yet allowed the recipient's credit, setting aside a notice demand of Rs.1,93,97,137. The credit bar in the Explanation to Rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 does not follow the goods into the recipient's hands, and the extended period was held unavailable.
15 min readNo Duty, No Section 28 Jurisdiction: CESTAT Chennai's Toyota Kirloskar Ruling on Sensor Classification and the Limits of Customs Reassessment
A CESTAT Chennai final order on customs classification of automotive sensors doubles as a ruling on the outer limits of Section 28 of the Customs Act — holding that a completed, nil-duty self-assessment cannot be reopened under Section 28 at all, and that no interest attaches to differential IGST for periods before the Customs Tariff Act's borrowing provision was amended to include interest.
13 min read